Although many of the cases involve freakish and improbable situations, ordinary events, such as where a passenger is injured when a vehicle stops abruptly, will also warrant the application of res ipsa. plaintiff) needs to establish negligence on the person who allegedly injured them (i.e. Where two or more defendants are acting jointly, the doctrine of res ipsa can be applied to establish their negligence. This inference of negligence does not mean that all other possible causes of the injurious event must be eliminated. Under this rule of evidence, a plaintiff is relieved from the burden of pleading and proving specific negligence. It will only be applied if the plaintiff can show through circumstantial evidence that their injury was more likely than not caused by the defendant. Terms of Use, Res Ipsa Loquitur - Accessibility Of Evidence, Law Library - American Law and Legal Information, Res Ipsa Loquitur - Elements, Accessibility Of Evidence, The Effect Of Res Ipsa. The event that occurred was exclusively in the control of the defendant. , the plaintiff must prove the following: : Defendant had a duty to care for the victim. A therapeutic negligence guarantee by and large closes with an estimation of harms. Inference of Negligence The plaintiff's injury must be of a type that does not ordinarily occur unless someone has been negligent. , which translates to “the thing speaks for itself,” utilizes circumstantial evidence to build a case by inference. The event could not have happened unless negligence took place. However, the jury awards her full compensation on the basis of res ipsa loquitur. In one case, a person was injured when an elevator in which she was riding fell very rapidly. Loss of Consortium Claims: Legal Definition & Injury Guide, Exotic Monkeys & Animals: Legal Guide for Rare Pets. new google.translate.TranslateElement({pageLanguage: 'en', includedLanguages: 'en,es', layout: google.translate.TranslateElement.InlineLayout.SIMPLE}, 'google_translate_element'); Negligence in Tort Law: The Rules of Res Ipsa Loquitur and Negligence Per Se The four elements central to any negligence case are duty, breach, causation and damages. In response, many states prescribe that the negligence must occur while the defendant has control over the instrumentality. If you were involved in an accident but not sure if you have enough evidence required for a successful case, consult with our team of legal experts at Valiente Mott. Eliora and her legal team can’t prove negligence on the part of Alliance Construction Co. since no one saw any worker dropping the wrench. : A wrench dropping from the building does not ordinarily happen without some sort of negligence. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur can be employed by a plaintiff to establish the defendant’s breach of duty in the absence of direct evidence of the defendant’s negligent conduct. To. The requirement of exclusive control by the defendant is not applied in cases involving VICARIOUS LIABILITY or shared responsibility for the same instrumentality or condition. establish all the elements of res ipsa loquitur. defendant). Res ipsa loquitur is Latin for “the thing speaks for itself.”In tort law, res ipsa loquitur (just res ipsa for short) is a doctrine that means one can presume the negligence of the defendant … The particular nature of the defendant's negligence need not be pinpointed. All Rights Reserved Example: Eliora is walking past a 2-story commercial building. The requirement of exclusive control by a defendant of the instrumentality causing injury does not mean that only a single entity has control. Generally, in a case it is the plaintiff who has to provide evidence to … Commercial air travel became so safe in the late twentieth century that planes engaged in regularly scheduled commercial flights generally do not crash unless someone has been negligent. In the example of the exploding soda bottle, the negligence of the bottler occurred somewhere in the bottling process. Res Ipsa Loquitur The plaintiff ordinarily has the burden of proving that the defendant did not exercise reasonable care and was therefore negligent. Since there must be exclusive control by the defendant, res ipsa cannot be used against multiple defendants in a negligence case where the plaintiff claims he has been injured by the negligence of another. , you first need to understand the concept of negligence. experts will assess your situation and let you know whether you have grounds for a negligence or even a res ipsa. Elements of Res Ipsa Loquitur The plaintiff must demonstrate three res ipsa loquitur elements to prove the defendant’s negligence: The event could not have happened unless negligence took place. In one case, a customer sat down in a chair in a store while waiting for a salesperson. Let’s say you sustained an injury due to someone else’s negligence. plaintiff) needs to establish negligence on the person who allegedly injured them (i.e. The plaintiff relied completely on res ipsa. : The breach of duty caused the victim’s injuries. The defendants claimed that the attempted dive caused the accident and, therefore, res ipsa was inapplicable. Res ipsa loquitur is a doctrine in the Anglo-American common law that says in a tort lawsuit a court can infer negligence from the very nature of an accident or injury in the absence of direct evidence on how any defendant behaved. }, Personal Injury Attorney in Reno – Car Accident Lawyer. Some state courts have departed from the requirement of exclusive control and applied res ipsa loquitur against multiple defendants. This interpretation has led to harsh results. The plaintiff could not have caused the incident. 1947 Danville Community Hosp. If the plaintiff is successful in demonstrating all three elements of res ipsa, the defendant has the opportunity for rebuttal. The fact that the bottle was sitting on a supermarket shelf and was no longer in the immediate possession of the bottler does not prevent the reasonable conclusion that the injury resulted from the negligence of the bottler. In light of the skier's testimony that he was about to be struck by the boat, as well as the testimony of other eyewitnesses, the jury could logically conclude that the attempted dive was not a cause of the accident. Three basic requirements must be satisfied before a court can submit the question of negligence to the jury under res ipsa loquitur.Inference of Negligence The plaintiff's injury must be of a type that does not ordinarily occur unless someone has been negligent. case covers the first three, namely, duty, breach of duty, and causation. By walking through a marked-off area, she contributed to the incident knowing very well it was a hazardous area. Free Consultation, Call us at (702) 623-2323 | Hablamos Español. This is because there could be no other alternative explanation but negligence on the part of the defendant. The service contract between the elevator company and the building owner established the fact that they exerted joint control over the elevator. mere fact of the collision, since neither driver is in exclusive control of the situation. The pedestrian institutes a negligence action against one driver and seeks to have res ipsa applied to his case. Res ipsa loquitur is a Latin phrase meaning "the thing speaks for itself." As discussed, a successful negligence case requires the plaintiff to prove four elements: duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages. 102 Las Vegas, NV 89117, 5470 Kietzke Lane, Suite 300 Reno, NV 89511, 2975 West Executive Parkway, Suite 217 Lehi UT 84043, function googleTranslateElementInit() { In one case, while an anesthetized patient was undergoing an operation for appendicitis, he suffered a traumatic injury to his shoulder. at (702) 623-2323 for your free consultation! 1949 Watts v. Richmond, F.R.R., 189 Va. 258, 52 S.E.2d 129. In different kinds of injury-related cases, res ipsa loquitur (Latin for "the thing speaks for itself") is a rule that may be used where the injured person has no direct evidence of how the injury occurred. The injured plaintiff must first show that the bottle was not cracked by mishandling after it left the plant of the bottler. 7785 W. Sahara Ave. Ste. The court denied recovery to the customer in her negligence action against the store because it found that the chair was not within the exclusive control of the store but rather was under the exclusive control of the customer at the time of injury. Some courts interpret this requirement to mean that exclusive control or management must have existed at the time of the injury. Although door may have been opened by passenger, res ipsa loquitur still applied. : Eliora is walking past a 2-story commercial building. There is a basic formula that most states use to determine the elements of res ipsa loquitur. A plaintiff using res ipsa to enable her case to go to the jury must prove that the defendant's negligence is the most probable cause of her injuries. This application of the rule has been regarded as inflexible by many courts, since it severely restricts the type of case to which res ipsa can be applied. It is a method of proving that a tort occurred in certain types of civil trials. If you try to place all of the elements in one giant paragraph, you’re going to have one big res ipsa loquitur mess. defendant). This article will further explain the res ipsa loquitur meaning, defenses of res ipsa, and how negligence plays a role in this legal doctrine. The burden of proof shifts from the plaintiff, who was required to prove negligence, to the defendant, who now requires to prove they were not negligent. Res ipsa loquitur does not create right of action unless proximate cause established. Elements Three basic requirements must be satisfied before a court can submit the question of negligence to the jury under res ipsa loquitur. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur (the occurrence or thing speaks for itself) permits an inference of negligence when: In general, there are three requirements that a plaintiff (or their attorney) must meet before a jury is allowed to infer the defendant was negligent: The incident in question does not normally occur unless someone has acted negligently. The court based its decision on the special responsibility for the plaintiff's safety undertaken by everyone concerned. In res ipsa loquitur, the elements of duty of care, breach, and causatio Treat each element of the res ipsa loquitur test separately. Exclusive Control by the Defendant The plaintiff's injury or damage must have been caused by an instrumentality or condition that was within the exclusive control of the defendant. Elements of the Doctrine Negligence is presumed whenever res ipsa loquitur is applicable, but the plaintiff still has the burden of proving that the defendant’s conduct was the proximate cause of the claimed injury. Res Ipsa Loquitur is a legal theory that can help individuals recover the compensation they deserve after an injury caused by another person. 2. He sued the driver and the owner of the boat for negligence, which could be found if res ipsa was applied. This means you can prove a fact to be true through reasonable inference of certain events or happenings relevant to the injury. An inference of negligence does not arise from the, A sample certificate of reliance on res ipsa loquitur. Revisiting our previous example, if Eliora walked through an area marked-off by warning tape, the construction company could argue that she should not have been there in the first place. Under the doctrine, the facts of the occurrence show, prima facie, the … T There are, however, two special negligence law doctrines that assist in proving the first two elements. What Is Res Ipsa Loquitur? Consulta Gratuita. In order for res ipsa loquitur to succeed in a medical malpractice suit, the fact that the accident is one that ordinarily does not occur without a failure to exercise due care must be readily apparent to the layperson as common knowledge. The elements now necessary to establish a res ipsa loquiturcase are: 1. The Michigan Appellate Court stated that a prima facie res ipsa loquitur case proceeds on a theory that, but for negligence, the claimed injury does not ordinarily occur. The event that occurred was exclusively in the control of the defendant. Res ipsa loquitur is a legal theory or doctrine in personal injury cases allowing a plaintiff to prove the defendant’s negligence using circumstantial evidence instead of the violation of the law. However, use of the doctrine “does not relieve the plaintiff of the ultimate burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence all of the elements necessary for recovery.” jury may be instructed that, even though it does not find that the facts giving rise. The trial court accepted this argument, which was later rejected by the appellate court. Choose from 73 different sets of The Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur flashcards on Quizlet. , defenses of res ipsa, and how negligence plays a role in this legal doctrine. Our Las Vegas personal injury attorney experts will assess your situation and let you know whether you have grounds for a negligence or even a res ipsa loquitur case. She sustains traumatic brain injury as a result. In reality, it is a high standard to meet. : The wrench obviously belonged to Alliance Construction Co., the construction company working on-site at the time. The jury found for the plaintiff since a falling elevator is not the type of accident that usually occurs without negligence, so that the negligence of those in control can be inferred. Res Ipsa Loquitur with reference to Case Laws, the application of which shifts the burden of proof on the defendant. Superior Court Denies Appeal After Applying Elements of 'Res Ipsa Loquitur' On September 7, 2007, in a unanimous opinion regarding MacNutt v.Temple University Hospital, 2007 Pa. Super. Res Ipsa Loquitur Under tort law, in order for a person to receive compensation for injuries inflicted upon them, they typically must present a preponderance of evidence, proving that another party was negligent and that negligence caused their damages. to the presumption have been proved by a preponderance of the evidence, it may. For a personal injury case to be successful, the victim (i.e. Using the principle of res ipsa loquitur in a civil lawsuit requires the plaintiff to prove several specific elements existed at the time of the incident. To get a better grasp of the res ipsa meaning, you first need to understand the concept of negligence. for short, allows a judge or jury to presume negligence on the part of the defendant without proving it. 2. Res ipsa loquitur declares certain circumstantial evidence sufficient to withstand a motion for directed verdict as a matter of law. For instance, the defendant could make a case that the victim contributed to the incident in some way. Res ipsa loquitur is a Latin term meaning "the thing speaks for itself". Inference of Negligence The plaintiff's injury must be of a type that does not ordinarily occur unless someone has been negligent. Res ipsa was applied against all of the doctors and hospital employees connected with the operation, although not all of them were negligent. Where the inference of negligence depends upon facts beyond the common knowledge of jurors, EXPERT TESTIMONY is necessary to furnish this information. v. Thompson, 186 Va. 746, 43 S.E.2d 882. In other words, while there is no direct proof of negligence, the injuries sustained by the victim cannot be explained by anything else except for negligence. Res ipsa loquitur, which translates to “the thing speaks for itself,” utilizes circumstantial evidence to build a case by inference. In one case, a water skier was injured when the propeller of the boat that had been towing him struck his arm as the boat was attempting to pick him up. and its Licensors In Pennsylvania, it is only applied sparingly. asserts that negligence can be presumed without proof. She brought a negligence action against both the owner of the building and the company that manufactured the elevator and had the maintenance service contract for the building. Under the concept of res ipsa, you (as the plaintiff) must show that the event wouldn’t normally happen unless someone was negligent. It is sufficient to establish that the explosion would not have occurred unless the bottler had been negligent. Res ipsa loquitur is a Latin phrase that means " the thing speaks for itself." The translation of the term is “the thing speaks for itself.”If you file a personal injury lawsuit regarding an accident or … In order to file a successful personal injury suit, the plaintiff still needs to prove harm. : Eliora was merely a pedestrian walking by at the time – not in any way connected to the wrench falling. Posted in Lawsuit on January 31, 2018. C) To establish res ipsa loquitur in most states, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the indicated negligence is within the scope of the defendant's duty to the plaintiff. In appropriate cases, therefore, the. At the time, construction and renovations are being done to this building by a construction company, Alliance Construction Co. As Eliora walks by the building, a wrench falls onto her head. This does not mean, however, that the plaintiff must account for every minute of the existence of the bottle from the time it left the plant. Basic Requirements of Res Ipsa Loquitur: In practical terms, res ipsa loquitur is a rule of evidence. The appellate court decided that the question of whether the attempted dive caused the accident should have been presented to the jury under res ipsa. As discussed, a successful negligence case requires the plaintiff to prove four elements: duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages. To prove res ipsa loquitor negligence, the plaintiff must prove 3 things: The incident was of a type that does not generally happen without negligence It was caused by an instrumentality solely in defendant’s control The plaintiff did not contribute to the cause The injury or damages sustained could not, under ordinary circumstances, occur without negligence on the part of the defendant. But, there is one major problem – you don’t have any evidence to prove that person was negligent. This requirement, which is the inference of negligence, allows res ipsa to be applied to a wide variety of situations, such as the falling of elevators, the presence of a dead mouse in a bottle of soda, or a streetcar careening through a restaurant. To establish negligence, the plaintiff must prove the following: The plaintiff has the burden of proof to demonstrate these four elements of negligence. 279, 932 A.2d 980 (Pa. Super. Substantial evidence as to the first element may be provided by an expert's testimony that the damage or injury ordinarily does not occur in the absence of negligence; if substantial evidence also supports the other two elements, then the plaintiff is entitled to a jury instruction on res ipsa loquitur. A res ipsa loquitur case covers the first three, namely, duty, breach of duty, and causation. At the time, construction and renovations are being done to this building by a construction company, Alliance Construction Co. As Eliora walks by the building, a wrench falls onto her head. The plaintiff attempted to dive underwater when he saw the boat approaching him, but he was unsuccessful in escaping injury. The res ipsa loquitur definition asserts that negligence can be presumed without proof. For a personal injury case to be successful, the victim (i.e. Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationFree Legal Encyclopedia: Reputation to Owen Josephus RobertsRes Ipsa Loquitur - Elements, Accessibility Of Evidence, The Effect Of Res Ipsa, Copyright © 2020 Web Solutions LLC. The legal doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, res ipsa for short, allows a judge or jury to presume negligence on the part of the defendant without proving it. It stated that a plaintiff may rely upon res ipsa loquitur even though he has participated in the events leading to the accident if the evidence excludes his conduct as the responsible cause. The elements needed to show res ipsa loquitur vary by state. If the plaintiff can substantiate the fact of careful handling in general and the absence of unusual incidents, such as the deliberate tampering of the bottled goods by an unknown person, such facts would permit reasonable persons to conclude that the injury was more likely than not to have been caused by the defendant's negligence while he had exclusive control of the bottle. Contact us today at (702) 623-2323 for your free consultation! These include: 1. 3. The plaintiff must demonstrate three res ipsa loquitur elements to prove the defendant’s negligence: Let’s apply these three elements to our previous example: By establishing these three elements, the plaintiff can successfully bring a case of res ipsa against the defendant. Such testimony is usually presented in cases of professional negligence, such as MEDICAL MALPRACTICE. Plaintiff fell through open door on train. It is a doctrine of law that one is presumed to be negligent if he/she/it had exclusive control of whatever caused the injury even though there is no specific evidence of an act of negligence, and … Even though there was no direct evidence, the event of a wrench dropping by the building cannot be explained by anything but negligence on the part of Alliance Construction Co. In personal injury law, the concept of res ipsa loquitur (or just "res ipsa" for short) operates as an evidentiary rule that allows plaintiffs to establish a rebuttable presumption of negligence on the part of the defendant through the use of circumstantial evidence. This is because there could be no other alternative explanation but negligence on the part of the defendant. D) The plaintiff's proof of all the elements of res ipsa loquitur requires a finding of negligence. This can be done through medical bills or doctor’s reports. The chair collapsed and the customer was injured. The object or occurrence that caused the injury or damages was within the defendant’s exclusive control. In other words, while there is no direct proof of negligence, the injuries sustained by the victim cannot be explained by anything else except for negligence. An expert witness can testify directly in regard to the inferred fact itself, such as when the expert testifies that the plaintiff's injury would not have occurred if the doctor had not been negligent. , while an anesthetized patient was undergoing an operation for appendicitis, he suffered a traumatic injury to shoulder! May be instructed that, even though it does not ordinarily occur unless someone been.: a wrench dropping from the, a customer sat down in a chair in a chair in a while! Generally, in a chair in a case that the bottle was cracked! Three elements of res ipsa loquiturcase are: 1 the evidence you present rule... Plaintiff 's injury must be satisfied before a court can submit the question negligence. In some way hazardous area a case it is sufficient to establish negligence on defendant... You sustained an injury due to someone else ’ s reports of negligence does not find the! Incident knowing very well it was a hazardous area he was unsuccessful in escaping injury better grasp of bottler... Withstand a motion for directed verdict as a matter of law dive underwater when saw. Be found if res ipsa loquitur would not have been attributable to any cause which! A successful personal injury suit, the victim ’ s exclusive control of the injury from the a. Reports are necessary to establish their negligence not cracked by mishandling after it the. Va. 746, 43 S.E.2d 882 consultation, Call us at ( 702 623-2323! Interpret this requirement to mean that all other possible causes of the has... To case Laws, the victim ( i.e had a duty to care for the plaintiff is relieved from building! Provide evidence to prove that person was negligent proving specific negligence first show that bottle... Jury awards her full compensation on the basis of res ipsa pedestrian injured... Accepted this argument, which translates to “ the thing speaks for itself, utilizes. Personal injury suit, the Construction company working on-site at the time of the,! Not mean that only a single entity has control, but he was unsuccessful escaping... Negligence depends upon facts beyond the common knowledge of jurors, expert TESTIMONY is necessary establish... He was unsuccessful in escaping injury through a marked-off area, she contributed to the jury under res ipsa test. Certificate of reliance on res ipsa case Eliora is walking past a commercial... A negligence action against one driver and seeks to have res ipsa loquitur the plaintiff needs! Order to file a successful personal injury suit, the Construction company working at... A person was injured when an elevator in which she was riding fell very rapidly special negligence law doctrines assist... An elevator in which she was riding fell very rapidly damages sustained could not have done anything that contributed... The time of the defendant without proving it meaning, you first need to understand the concept of.... Defendant ’ s injuries through medical bills or doctor ’ s reports prove that person was negligent in injury! Injury must be of a type that does not mean that only a single has! Inference of negligence to the accident ) the plaintiff ordinarily has the burden of proof on the basis res! Plaintiff is successful in demonstrating all three elements of your res ipsa still... Duty caused the victim contributed to the accident that caused the accident needs! Personal injury case to be true through reasonable inference of negligence the compensation they after... For rebuttal its decision on the person who allegedly injured them ( i.e of jurors expert! Collision, since neither driver is in exclusive control medical MALPRACTICE the part the! Could not, under ordinary circumstances, occur without negligence on the defendant without res ipsa loquitur elements it Alliance Construction Co. the... Past a 2-story commercial building submit the question of negligence the plaintiff is relieved from requirement!, it may file a successful personal injury suit, the victim S.E.2d.... Cause for which the plaintiff must first show that the facts giving rise ipsa case done through bills. Guarantee by and large closes with an estimation of harms, Exotic Monkeys & Animals: legal Guide Rare. Operation, although not all of the injurious event must be eliminated the evidence, a was... Furnish this information video on Nested IRAC very rapidly knowledge of jurors, expert is. Situation and let you know undoubtedly it was that particular person who allegedly injured them ( i.e she was fell! That caused the accident that caused the accident that caused the injury or damages was within the defendant was an. The fact that they exerted joint control over the elevator company and the building owner established the fact they! Been proved by a preponderance of the res ipsa was applied plaintiff must prove the following:! Is a legal theory that can help individuals recover the compensation they deserve after injury. Was that particular person who allegedly injured them ( i.e occurred in res ipsa loquitur elements types civil. Satisfied before a court can submit the question of negligence the event could not have unless... Doctrines that assist in proving the first three, namely, duty, breach of duty the! While the defendant could make a case it is a Latin phrase means! On-Site at the time of the evidence you present should rule out that you yourself or a third caused! Thompson, 186 Va. 746 res ipsa loquitur elements 43 S.E.2d 882 merely a pedestrian is when. 2-Story commercial building many states prescribe that the explosion would not have unless! Opened by passenger, res ipsa loquitur test separately Co., the did! Him, but he was unsuccessful in escaping injury allows a judge or jury to presume negligence on the who! Thing speaks for itself. anesthetized patient was undergoing an operation for appendicitis he. Compensation on the person who allegedly injured them ( i.e to someone else s. A tort occurred in certain types of civil trials an injury caused by person. To provide evidence to … establish all the elements of res ipsa loquitur is a Latin phrase means! Not mean that only a single entity has control was not cracked by after... If the plaintiff 's injury must be satisfied before a court can submit the question of negligence test.! `` the thing speaks for itself, ” utilizes circumstantial evidence to build a it... Is relieved from the building owner established the fact that they exerted joint control over the elevator and! Guide for Rare Pets any evidence to prove that person was negligent major problem – you don ’ have... Presented in cases of professional negligence, such as medical MALPRACTICE a negligence. There could be no other alternative explanation but negligence on the part of the collision, since neither is! In response, many states prescribe that the negligence of the evidence you present rule... Mishandling after it left the plant of the injurious event must be of a type does... The burden of proving that a tort occurred in certain types of civil trials no alternative! Within the defendant are acting jointly, the plaintiff 's proof of the! ’ s say you sustained an injury due to someone else ’ s exclusive control by preponderance... In certain types of civil trials make a case that the defendant 's need... Customer sat down in a store while waiting for a personal injury case to true! Existed at the time – not in any way connected to the wrench belonged. The explosion would not have occurred unless the bottler occurred somewhere in the example of the three elements of ipsa! On Nested IRAC have grounds for a personal injury case to be true through reasonable of... & Animals: legal Guide for Rare Pets special negligence law doctrines that assist in proving the first two.... Mean that exclusive control and applied res ipsa loquitur requires a finding of negligence the plaintiff 's injury must satisfied... Undoubtedly it was a hazardous area he suffered a traumatic injury to his case is the plaintiff must have. Cracked by mishandling after it left the plant of the collision, neither... The fact that they exerted joint control over the elevator in reality, it may you know whether have... Preponderance of the exploding soda bottle, the Doctrine of res ipsa was applied against all the... Which the plaintiff 's safety undertaken by everyone concerned contract between the elevator of duty, and causation Latin that! Have existed at the time, under ordinary circumstances, occur without negligence on part. Directed verdict as a matter of law rejected by the appellate court beyond the common knowledge jurors! He suffered a traumatic injury to his case store while waiting for a negligence action one... And causation loquitur against multiple defendants ipsa can be applied to his case large closes an! Is the plaintiff is relieved from the building owner established the fact that they exerted joint over... ) needs to prove that person was negligent the appellate court who has to provide evidence to harm... A customer sat down in a store while waiting for a salesperson to get better... Free consultation to someone else ’ s exclusive control of the injurious event must be a... A therapeutic negligence guarantee by and large closes with an estimation of harms without proof applied to negligence. Exotic Monkeys & Animals: legal Guide for Rare Pets, expert TESTIMONY is to. Whether you have grounds for a personal injury case to be true through reasonable inference of the! Victim ’ s reports or even a res ipsa loquitur – you don t. Control of the collision, since neither driver is in exclusive control applied. Responsibility for the plaintiff ordinarily has the burden of proof on the person who allegedly them...