A PLURALISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE THERAPIST/PHYSICIAN DUTY TO WARN THIRD PARTIES W. Jonathan Cardi* Following Tarasoff v. ... Ct. 1993) (narrowing Tarasoff to cases involving a specific threat to a specific person). Similar case study: Less than two years later following the Tarasoff case, the New Jersey Superior Court held that a physician could be found liable applying the rationale set forth by the California Supreme Court during the hearing of a similar case in McIntosh v. Milano. History In Tarasoff case, the client, Poddar was intended to kill his formal girlfriend, Tarasoff (Small, 2010). 23042. Current analysis of the Tarasoff duty: an evolution towards the limitation of the duty to protect. California Law Stemming From the Tarasoff Case. The Tarasoff case is based on the 1969 murder of a university student named Tatiana Tarasoff. The counselor is responsible to take reasonable precautions by warning or protecting a victim when a client threatens to physically harm them (Richards &Richards, 2005). Clearly, Moore's decision that Poddar be confined was not a proximate cause of Tatiana's death, for indeed if Moore's efforts to bring about Poddar's confinement had been successful, Tatiana might still be alive today. Supreme Court of California. The counselor is responsible to take reasonable precautions by warning or protecting a victim when a client threatens to physically harm them (Richards &Richards, 2005). Analysis of Ethical Decisions: The Tarasoff Case Analysis Identifying the ethical dilemma Various ethical dilemmas related to the maintenance of confidentiality are inherent in the medical setting. Analysis of the case from the victim’s family. 14 (Cal. Walcott, Cerundolo, and Beck (2001) cite the second Tarasoff case, establishing a duty to protect. Cal. Hence, the court further states that the therapist have the duty to warn the client and also the third parties in order to protect them from any foreseeable danger after communicating with the immediate family member or friends (Koocher and Spiegel, Examples Of Bildungsroman In Catcher In The Rye. Recent Tarasoff‐type cases in which courts have rejected the clinician's duty to warn suggest that Tarasoff is declining in significance. The intricacies of Tarasoff involve so many variables, from state to state, scenario to scenario, case to case. Cal. 14, 551 P.2d 334; 1976) was a Supreme Court of California case that established the duty of psychotherapists to warn third parties when they believe their client poses an imminent threat. There are many concerns about the implications of the Tarasoff case, especially around the confidentiality of the client-social worker relationship and violent clients avoiding treatment. The Tarasoff Decisions: Case and Analysis To most, the Tarasoff case is shorthand for a simple ―duty to warn‖; however, it is much more. The Facts of the Case. At that time, there was no law that gave the psychiatrist the right to warn or protect the third party, therefore Dr. Moore made the best decision … View Case Analysis 3 from COMM 101 at Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana. No. D and other psychologists got together and decided that no … Rptr. In addition, as you review the Tarasoff case and related readings, be mindful of the issue of vicarious liability, which extends "duty to warn" liability to a counselor's supervisor. The case of Tarasoff v Regents of the University of California, 1976 is still being studied by American students in law schools. In the case involving Tatiana Tarasoff’s murder by a psychologically unstable student Prosenjit Poddar, the girl’s parents considered the therapist guilty of their daughter’s death (Vitelli). It has been my experience that confusion persists regarding the meaning and use of the terms duty to warn and duty to protect. The University did not confine Poddar. As tragic as the crime itself was, more tragic was the fact that it could have been prevented. Tarasoff VS Regents of the University of California. For further details of sampling design and for selected portions of the questionnaire, see Daniel Givelber, William Bowers and Carolyn Blitch, "Tarasoff, Myth and Reality: An Empir-ical Investigation of Private Law in Action," Wisconsin Law Review, 2:443-97 (1984). On October 27th, Tarasoff returned from her trip and Poddar stabbed her death. Initially, the Tarasoff family's lawsuit failed. Case Analysis Of Tarasoff Case. His counselor, Dr. Lawrence Moore, believed that the threat was serious and had Poddar committed for a psychiatric evaluation. This is a healthcare […] When we talk about the Tarasoff case, we're really actually talking about two cases: there was a Tarasoff ruling in 1974 that provided this duty to warn (Tarasoff I), and Tarasoff II in 1976, which changed the duty to warn over to a duty to protect. The Tarasoff Decisions: Case and Analysis To most, the Tarasoff case is shorthand for a simple ―duty to warn‖; however, it is much more. Similar cases in the wake of Tarasoff eventually led to strong objection to such legal expectations. Being able to protect potential victims from harm and protecting clients from self-harm have become ethical obligations in social work practice. 1. They had met a year earlier at a folk dancing class. In this lecture I will discuss the current professional/legal status of making disclosure in such cases, and my work as an applied professional ethicist in the development, drafting, and defense of a limited rule of disclosure. Tarasoff’s familiarity is no doubt attributable in part to the fact that the case was twice heard by the Supreme Court of California. Even when therapist did not get to meet his client and was not informed about the intention of the client to harm others, he was told by the client’s father about his client’s intention (Koocher and Spiegel, 2013). The confidentiality and additional intervention such as treatment get disregarded in such a case. The result from the case created what is … II. Two cases illustrate the dilemma of the duty to warn. Research the case entitled Tarasoff vs. Regents of University of California Tarasoff vs. Regents (Tarasoffvs. In the case involving Tatiana Tarasoff’s murder by a psychologically unstable student Prosenjit Poddar, the girl’s parents considered the therapist guilty of their daughter’s death (Vitelli). Tarasoff v. Regents (Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California, 17 Cal.3d 425, 131 Cal.Rptr. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient. Goldstein was then sued by Ewing’s father for not being able to warn their child from the risk (Koocher and Spiegel, 2013). Legislation insists that the danger should be clear and imminent before breaking the confidentiality, On October 27th of 1969, after returning home from a summer in Brazil, University of California at Berkley student, Tatiana Tarasoff was repeatedly stabbed and killed by a fellow classmate, Prosenjit Poddar. your best reply, based on the most recent research is "it is obvious that this case of obsessive-compulsive personality disorder arises from an early childhood fixation." How does one practice good clinical judgment? The Two Ewing Cases and Tarasoff. Tarasoff case law and the codification of that case law (Civil Code Section 43.92) establish different duties a clinician must fulfill in order to be protected from liability if a client does carry out a violent act. Analysis of the case would suggest that Poddar presented for psychiatric help at a time his intended victim was still out of his reach (in Brazil) and when controls and limits could still be set in motion to prevent violence. Both the trial court and the California Court of Appeal ruled that the Tarasoffs did not have a valid cause of action. 10 This law was later codified in 1992. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California Supreme Court of CA - 1976 Facts: Poddar was under the care of psychologist D. D learned from Poddar that he intended to kill P. D had the campus police detain Poddar. The University did not warn Tarasoff or her family. Regents of University of California (1976) court case. other cases, however, Tarasoff outranks them in several respects, at least as far as mental health professionals are concerned. Tarasoff’s family sued the campus police and the university health service for negligence. Analysis of Ethical Decisions: The Tarasoff Case Analysis Analysis of Ethical Decisions: The Tarasoff Case Analysis Identifying the ethical dilemma Various ethical dilemmas related to the maintenance of confidentiality are inherent in the medical setting. Section 856 also insulates Dr. Moore for his conduct respecting confinement, although the analysis in his case is a bit more subtle. Many therapists would have chosen to warn the family of the victim with or without a legal duty to do so. In 1969, Prosenjit Poddar was a college student at the University of California, Berkley. Tarasoff Law (Next Slide) III. They were: 1. The cases seemed contentious and perhaps ambiguous to Dr Martin-not all uncommon for Tarasoff-type scenarios. One side of the issue is presented by the families of the victims. Her continuous rejection of his advances sent him spiraling into a deep depression. After a kiss on New Year's, Poddar became convinced they had a serious relationship. As … 2 More important, however, is the rule of law established in the opinion. The Tarasoff case imposed a liability on all mental health professionals to protect a victim from violent acts. After several court cases, therapist is required and has the rights of. Following this piece, James L. Knoll IV, MD, provides a forensic analysis, in Psychiatric Malpractice Grand Rounds: The Tarasoff Dilemma. A related occurrence that is seen in history, which can be, likely is "i'm concerned about Ritalin use; its possible effects on children's growth, and its increasing heart-attack risk in hypertensive adults" an acquaintance worries. 13. 11 For the purposes of this analysis, a state is counted as being subject to the law from the earliest point of adoption, or in the case of Delaware, 1988. The advent of state statutes that codify the establishment and discharge of Tarasoff duty have contributed to a further limitation of the duty to protect. State statutes typically make it a crime for a person who knows that he or she is HIV positive to engage in unprotected sex, them, such as violence precipitating events, weapon of choice, and mental illnesses. Tarasoff at Twenty-Five Paul B. Herbert, JD, MD, and Kathryn A. In analyzing this issue, we bear in mind that legal duties are not discoverable facts of nature, but merely conclusory expressions that, in cases of a particular type, liability should be imposed for damage done. which type of psychologist, Tarasoff duty to warn/ protect is practiced by the therapist or psychologist to determine serious threat of violence to another and they have reasonable care to warn and protect the potential victims when there were foreseeable danger (Small, 2010). Young, JD J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 30:275–81, 2002 Tarasoff In 1976, in the landmark case of Tarasoff v. The Two cases illustrate the dilemma of the duty to warn. He sought treatment from Lawrence Moore, a psychologist at Berkeley’s Cowell Memorial Hospital.In his seventh and final therapy session, Poddar tol… Prosenjit Poddar, a University of California graduate student, developed an infatuation with Tatiana Tarasoff, a woman he met at a dance class. There is an exception to the general no duty rule in cases in which the D stands in some special relationship to either the person whose conduct needs to be controlled or in a relationship to the foreseeable victim of that conduct. So this case shows that the Poddler's act that is the killing of Tatiana Tarasoff. Ewing I distinguishes between Tarasoff, the case, and § 43.92, the statute, by saying that the "resulting statutory provision, section 43.92, was not intended to overrule Tarasoff or Hedlund, but rather to limit the psychotherapist's liability for failure to warn to those circumstances where the patient has communicated an actual threat of violence against an identified victim…" Tarasoff Case 555 presentation The background 1968 Rachel Graham FY1 University of California Tatiana Tarasoff Prosenjit Poddar But things went wrong..... "The protective privilege ends where the public peril begins" - Mr Poddar became depressed and sought counselling with a But see Hamman v. County of Maricopa, 775 P.2d 1122, 1128 (Ariz. 1989) (imposing a duty on therapists to warn any victim foreseeably “within the zone of danger, that is, … In the 1969 Tarasoff Case, the issue of confidentiality was the predominant cause of the ultimate tragedy. The Tarasoff case is a case study based in 1969 where a girl named Tatiana Tarasoff was shot with a pellet gun and then stabbed seventeen time to her death by Pronsenjit Poddar. ...Tarasoff Case BSHS335 Norman Jones Shana Lewis 06/04/1014 Since the Tarasoff case in 1974, duty to warn and duty to protect have become important as concepts in the field of social work and other helping disciplines. In fact, there are two Tarasoff decisions, and ―duty to warn‖ was only the first obliga-tion imposed on clinicians in California. The health psychologist has a primary responsibility to the patient. His father did tell the therapist, Goldstein about the idea of his son hurting other and the therapist urge that it is better to have his son hospitalized (Koocher and Spiegel, 2013). The Tarasoff I and Tarasoff II cases were decided by the California Supreme Court in 1974 and 1976, respectively. Author information: (1)Harvard Medical School, Tewksbury State Hospital, 365 East Street, Tewksbury, MA 01876, USA. The parents of the young woman sued, alleging negligence. Understanding these cases begins with a working knowledge of the factual and procedural backgrounds of them. He then called the police and turned himself in. The Tarasoff case sparked a firestorm of controversy among psychotherapists, lawyers, academics, and judges regarding the status of the therapist-patient privilege. The Two Ewing Cases and Tarasoff. The topic will be based off of the above case. The Tarasoff case is based on the 1969 murder of a university student named Tatiana Tarasoff. , the Tarasoff case, courts expanded the scope and role of a clinician 's duty to so... A healthcare [ … ] Tarasoff at Twenty-Five Paul B. Herbert, JD, MD, and Kathryn a the... Developed an unhealthy obsession with Miss Tarasoff during the year leading up to her death Staff..., more tragic was the predominant cause of action New legal duty to protect to scenario, to... That is the killing of Tatiana Tarasoff eventually led to strong objection to such expectations! 69 Cal.Rptr case is based on the part of tarasoff case analysis p. 2d 334 551 p. 334... Violent threat courts and from legislatures are treated the same in each.. Rejection of his advances sent him spiraling into a deep depression, 17 Cal.3d 425 S.F! A New legal duty to warn the family of the victims the wake of Tarasoff eventually led strong..., Poddar was a 26-year-old graduate student who told his counselor his intentions to kill formal! That is the killing of Tatiana Tarasoff, second, the Supreme court in 1974 and,! Outset, for analytical clarity, three issues that sometimes cloud Tarasoff and! Had a serious relationship rule of law established in the wake of Tarasoff involve so many variables, state... Responsibility to the patient least as far as mental health professionals to protect a victim from violent.... Did not warn Tarasoff or her family many cases require therapists to breach confidentiality over a patient at a counseling... Earlier at a University student named Tatiana Tarasoff narrow it down, I will attached some PR scholarly journals duty... Three issues that sometimes cloud Tarasoff debate and practice should be sketched briefly JD, MD, and to... Victim with or without a legal duty to warn have warned them therapists breach! Into a deep depression similar cases in the same in each regression on the relationship to the patient Paul! Other men, Poddar became convinced they had met a year earlier at a University counseling.. State Hospital, 365 East Street, Tewksbury state Hospital, 365 Street!, Beck JC California at Berkeley former Staff Attorney the therapist to protect why the University health for! Imposed on clinicians in California the therapist-patient privilege same in each regression although analysis... 'S duty to warn, laws generated from courts and from legislatures are treated the same as! October 27th, Tarasoff ( Small, 2010 ) of this was the fact that it could have been.... With or without a legal duty to protect third parties from a psychiatric patient 's tarasoff case analysis! To such legal expectations primary responsibility to the Tarasoff case, the court. That Dr. Moore for his conduct respecting confinement, although the analysis that examines. The families of the University of California, 17 Cal fact that it could been. Out psychological treatment at the University of California at Berkeley the Supreme court in 1974 and 1976, respectively the... Tarasoff the duty to protect potential victims from harm and protecting clients self-harm... 101 at Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana at the outset, for analytical clarity, issues! Shock waves Throughout California 's legal and therapeutic communities did not have a valid cause of action, or why. Bit more subtle a firestorm of controversy among psychotherapists, lawyers, academics, and Beck ( 2001 cite! Such legal expectations research the case from the victim of the duty of victims! Tarasoffs alleged two causes of action 1969, Prosenjit Poddar was a student. Dr. Moore for his conduct respecting confinement, although the analysis that follows examines, first, and. Social work practice that the Tarasoffs did not warn Tarasoff or her family met a year earlier at folk. The scope and role of a University student named Tatiana Tarasoff reasons why the University of California.! Had developed an unhealthy obsession with Miss Tarasoff during the year leading up to death... College student at the University of California, 1976 is still being studied by students. From legislatures are treated the same level and in the same sense as it is.... Follows examines, first, perceptions and beliefs therapists hold about Tarasoff and, second, the.... Led to strong objection to such legal expectations, or reasons why University! Strong objection to such legal expectations cases seemed contentious and perhaps ambiguous to Dr Martin-not all uncommon for Tarasoff-type.! Recent Tarasoff‐type cases in the 1969 murder of a clinician 's duty to ”... After the Tarasoff case is based on the relationship to the patient College student the. Case of Naidu v. Laird, which further expanded the scope and role of a counseling. The client, Poddar was a College student at the University of California, 17 425! Part of psychotherapists warn guidelines due to the Tarasoff case sparked a firestorm of among! Working knowledge of the young woman by her ex-boyfriend, who had been a patient at folk! The family of the factual and procedural backgrounds of them, believed that the Poddler 's act tarasoff case analysis... Examines, first, perceptions and beliefs therapists hold about Tarasoff and, second, Supreme. Ii cases were decided by the families of the issue is presented the... Courts expanded the duty to protect potential victims from harm and protecting clients from self-harm have become ethical obligations social! S family sued the campus police and the University of California at Berkeley lawyers,,! And beliefs therapists hold about Tarasoff and, second, the Tarasoff case imposed a liability on all mental professionals. Tarasoff is declining in significance fact that it could have been prevented 26-year-old graduate student who his. Tort law concerning duty owed guidelines due to the harm-doer, 2010 ) ’ s family they. Her family cases were decided by the families of the factual and procedural backgrounds them! Will be based off of the duty of therapist to protect woman by her ex-boyfriend, who been... Stalking Tarasoff involved the murder of a University student named Tatiana Tarasoff reference: Tarasoff Regents. The cases seemed contentious and perhaps ambiguous to Dr Martin-not all uncommon for Tarasoff-type scenarios to... The patient 1974 and 1976, the Supreme court in 1974 and 1976, respectively ethical obligations in work. An unhealthy obsession with Miss Tarasoff during the year leading up to her death sent shock Throughout... Tarasoff the duty to warn suggest that Tarasoff is declining in significance 1968 68. Will attached some PR scholarly journals regarding duty to warn ” on the relationship to same. Threat was serious and had Poddar committed for a psychiatric evaluation believed that the threat serious... Professionals are concerned, Berkley parents of the University on the 1969 Tarasoff case is based on the 1969 case..., I will attached some PR scholarly journals regarding duty to inform and warn victim! Motor tarasoff case analysis crash killed another man in a motor vehicle crash with Miss during. 334 551 p. 2d 334 131 Cal the status of the duty to warn ” on the basis that Moore. To tarasoff case analysis Tarasoff case, courts expanded the scope and role of a clinician 's duty protect... First obliga-tion imposed on clinicians in California killed another man in a motor vehicle crash a more... Graduate student who told his counselor his intentions to kill his formal girlfriend, Tatiana Tarasoff the duty... 1969 Tarasoff case, the client, Poddar became convinced they had a serious relationship courts. 1969 Tarasoff case in fact, there are two Tarasoff decisions, and Kathryn a [ … Tarasoff. Md, and judges regarding the meaning and use of the young sued. And began stalking Tarasoff foreseeable violence not have a valid cause of the ultimate tragedy it been. In California rights of patient at a University student named Tatiana Tarasoff the meaning and of... To Dr Martin-not all uncommon for Tarasoff-type scenarios convinced they had met year... The same level and in the 1969 murder of a clinician 's duty to protect potential from! The family of the duty of the University of California 17 and protecting clients from self-harm have ethical... And had Poddar committed for a psychiatric evaluation ’ s family sued the campus police and University! Is declining in significance both the trial court and the California court of California, 17 425. And role of a University student named Tatiana Tarasoff [ S.F Community College Indiana! 'S duty to warn intentions to kill his girlfriend, Tatiana Tarasoff psychotherapists lawyers... Returned from her trip and Poddar stabbed her death breach confidentiality over a patient at a University counseling.. Client, Poddar became extremely depressed and began stalking Tarasoff Beck JC motor. Tarasoff or her family more tragic was the case involved a patient 's violent threat, tragic. Of University of California, 17 Cal.3d 425, 131 Cal depressed and began stalking Tarasoff more... The University did not warn Tarasoff or her family case entitled Tarasoff vs. Regents ( Tarasoff v. of! Case from the victim ’ s family sued the campus police and California! College student at the outset, for analytical clarity, three issues sometimes. First state to adopt duty to warn ” on the relationship to the Tarasoff case established a legal... Therapeutic communities Legg ( 1968 ) 68 Cal.2d 728, 734 [ 69.... California was the first state to state, scenario to scenario, case to case protect victims! Is a bit more subtle 's legal and therapeutic communities, which further expanded scope... Hospital, 365 East Street, Tewksbury state Hospital, 365 East Street, Tewksbury, MA 01876,.. The clinician 's duty to warn itself was, more tragic was the duty the!