Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization. v. Max Rothenberg & Co. Annotate this Case. eCase is one of the world's most informative online sources for cases from different courts in United States' Federal and all states, and court cases will be updated continually - legalzone Defendants are certified public accountants. In my opinion, the auditors should have slowed down after getting the initial round of information. Chairman: Jack Kempner, Ph.D. Decided April 17, 1968. Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department. Plaintiff is a corporation owning a co-operative apartment house. Pets on a case by case basis with pet deposit. Discuss at least six of the matters that should be specified in an engagement letter. As this was a nonjury trial this court should make new findings and render a verdict for defendants. docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case. Plaintiff's loss resulted from the fact that Riker (the head of Riker & Company) appropriated certain of the collections to his own use and also failed to pay plaintiff's bills. 1136 TENANTS' CORPORATION v. Add to this the paltry fee for the work and the responsibility that would be involved if an audit were contracted for. A | B| C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z. This is potent evidence of what the agreement was ( Pease Elliman v. Weissman, 4 A.D.2d 936). The record amply supports the trial court's findings that defendant was engaged to audit and not merely "write-up" plaintiff's books and records and that the procedures performed by defendant were "incomplete, inadequate and improperly employed". Subscribe. CourtListener is a project of Free Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. change. View more property details, sales history and Zestimate data on Zillow. Healthy Housing Case Study CITY OF TUKWILA, WA P eople spend approximately 90 percent of their time indoors, with an estimated 69 percent in the home.i,ii Environmental factors, such as lead and asthma triggers, originating in the home can re-sult in poor health.iii Quality of housing can impact people’s health: according to the National Healthy The importance of engagement letters under SSARS is highlighted after that. 1136 TENANTS' CORP. v. MAX ROTHENBERG & CO. Email | Print | Comments (0) View Case; Citing Case ; Citing Cases . Riker Company kept its own books, with which defendants had no connection. The 1136 Tenants case was important chiefly because of its emphasis on the legal liability of the CPA when associated with (1) an SEC engagement. One of the changes in auditing procedure which was brought about as a result of the 1136 Tenants Corp. case was that auditors were encouraged to begin using: A) Engagement letters. Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions. In the 1136 Tenants Corporation case, what was the essential difference in the way the client and the CPAs viewed the work to be done in the engagement? The 938 sq. Plaintiff has recovered a judgment amounting, with interest, to $237,278.83 for failure to perform services which were compensated for at the rate of $600 per annum. In my opinion, the proof was overwhelming that the hiring was as defendants claim. Utilization of the simplest audit procedures would have revealed Riker's defalcations. Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Solution.pdf Next Previous. Moreover, even if defendant were hired to perform only "write-up" services, it is clear, beyond dispute, that it did become aware that material invoices purportedly paid by Riker were missing, and, accordingly, had a duty to at least inform plaintiff of this. 1136 Tenants' Corp. v. Max Rothenberg & Co., 36 A.D.2d 804, N.Y. App. tance to displaced tenants in the amount of $2,000 for low-income tenants, or two months’ rent in other cases. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Defendant's work sheets indicate that defendant did examine plaintiff's bank statement, invoices and bills and, in fact, one of the work sheets is entitled "Missing Invoices 1/1/63-12/31/63". The 1136 Tenants v. Max Rothenberg and Company case (Chapter 5) established the need for an Engagement Letter at the start of an audit. 5 (1 Ratings ) Solved. Why did Congress enact the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act? ft. single-family home is a 3 bed, 1.0 bath property. On page 347 your book discusses the 1967 case 1136 Tenants Corp. v. Max Rothenberg & Co. This is directly contrary to evidence he gave on an earlier trial and in a deposition. During the period in question plaintiff's building and all operations in connection with it were managed by Riker & Company, a firm of managing agents which managed several buildings. 210 Caseco Ln , Port Orchard, WA 98366-4701 is currently not for sale. Recommended Citation. The record amply supports the trial court's findings that defendant was engaged to audit and not merely "write-up" plaintiff's books and records and that the procedures performed by defendant were "incomplete, inadequate and improperly employed". Owner’s business name is 1136 Tenants Corp. Jim Miller was associated with the company at the time. The 1136 Tenants v. Max Rothenberg and Company case (Chapter 5) established the need for an… 1 answer below » The 1136 Tenants v. Max Rothenberg and Company case (Chapter 5) established the need for an Engagement Letter at the start of an audit. Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department. 2d 120 (2d Dept. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. During the period in question plaintiff's building and all operations in connection with it were managed by Riker Company, a firm of managing agents which managed several buildings. Where a technical system is developed on the basis of the requirements set out in point 2.5.5, the principle of mutual recognition is applicable in accordance with Article 15(5). Add to this the paltry fee for the work and the responsibility that would be involved if an audit were contracted for. Citation. The questions of fact presented in this case were ably discussed in the decision of the court below and there is no reason why we should interfere with the result reached by that court. The 1136 Tenants case was a criminal case concerning a CPA's failure to uncover fraud during a financial statement audit. Moreover, the proof unequivocally shows that the statements issued by all the accountants hired by Riker (defendants and those that preceded them in the job) bore legends to the effect that they were unverified and no independent examination had been made. The result of 1136 Tenants' was that accountants might limit liability to client through the use of engagement letters. Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department. Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. 1136 Tenants Corporation v. Max Rothenberg and Company(1971)--A landmark case for accountants’ liability when they are associated with unaudited financial statements. 1136 Tenants' Corporation, Respondent, Argued April 2, 1968. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case. This permit was issued for job of type A2, which lets a Permittee to perform multiple types of work that does not change the use, egress, or occupancy of the building. Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature. An Illinois Supreme Court case may help change the long-standing interpretation of the 1971 case, 1136 Tenants' Corp. v. Max Rothenberg & Co. The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters. Click here to remove this judgment from your profile. Justia › US Law › Case Law › New York Case Law › New York Court of Appeals Decisions › 1968 Receive free daily summaries of new opinions from the New York Court of Appeals. A. ABC Mgmt. Auditing 8 Months Ago 30 Views. Utilization of the simplest audit procedures would have revealed Riker's defalcations. The 1136 Tenants case was a criminal case concerning a CPA's failure to uncover fraud during a financial statement audit. The 1136 Tenants v. Max Rothenberg and Company case (Chapter 5) established the need for an Engagement Letter at the start of an audit. Owner's address was provided as 675 3rd Avenue New York . Using the following letters, identify the case to which each statement is most closely related Smith v London Assurance Corp State Street Trust v Emst 1136 Tenants Corp v Max Rothenberg & Co Ultramares Corp. v Touche 2 Ernst& Ernst v Hochfelder Credit Alliance v Arthur Andersen Escott v BarChris Construction Corp 5 6 7 Match each of the options above to the itens below Established a three point … In case of any confusion, feel free to reach out to us.Leave your message here. University of Florida. Steuer, J., dissents in the following memorandum: Plaintiff is a corporation owning a co-operative apartment house. Irvin N. Gleim. The company was found negligent in doing “write up” work. But to require one in the relationship of defendants to take action would expand the obligation from bookkeeping to criminal detection. Previous question Next question Get more help from Chegg. The 1136 Tenants v. Max Rothenberg and Company case (Chapter 5) established the need for an Engagement Letter at the start of an audit. Moreover, even if defendant were hired to perform only "write-up" services, it is clear, beyond dispute, that it did become aware that material invoices purportedly paid by Riker were missing, and, accordingly, had a duty to at least inform plaintiff of this. Zyklus. The 1136 tenants' case was important because of its emphasis upon the legal liability of the cpa when associated with: Unaudited financial statements According to Statement of Auditing Standards number 1, the auditors responsibility for failure to detect fraud arises when such failure clearly results from failure to comply with generally accepted auditing standards. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1136 of 13 July 2015 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 402/2013 on the common safety method for risk evaluation and assessment (Text with EEA relevance) Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2015/1136 der Kommission vom 13. Receive free daily summaries of new opinions from the New York Court of Appeals. * Enter a valid Journal (must This case has been cited by these opinions: Shapiro v. Glekel (1974) View Citing Opinions Get Citation Alerts Toggle Dropdown. They might, conceivably, cause a fiduciary to report to his principal. This was argued primarily from observations that could have been made had an audit been made. The trial court in 1136 Tenants’ Corp. ruled that a CPA firm was negligent in its duties when it used “inadequate, incomplete, and improperly deployed” procedures when providing its services. View more property details, sales history and Zestimate data on Zillow. By Dawn Atchison Chesarek, Published on 01/01/75. Respondent shall recover of appellant $50 costs and disbursements. 1136 TENANTS' CORP. v. MAX ROTHENBERG & CO. Email | Print | Comments (0) View Case; Cited Cases; Citing Case ; Citing Cases . This is directly contrary to evidence he gave on an earlier trial and in a deposition. Get 1 point on providing a valid sentiment to this ... 1136 TENANTS'CORP. One of the changes in auditing procedure which was brought about as a result of the 1136 Tenants case was that auditors were encouraged to begin using: engagement letters. Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on July 1, 1970, in favor of plaintiff, after trial, based upon negligent performance of accounting services by defendant firm of certified public accountants, affirmed. The company was found negligent in doing “write up” work. The CPAs argued that they had been retained to do "write-up" work only, consisting of maintaining accounting records and preparing financial statements and tax returns. $40 application fee. Max Rothenberg & Company, Appellant, Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png. 1136 TENANTS' CORP. v. MAX ROTHENBERG CO. Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on July 1, 1970, in favor of plaintiff, after trial, based upon negligent performance of accounting services by defendant firm of certified public accountants, affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $50 costs and disbursements. The following resource may also help. Landlord–tenant law is a part of the common law that details the rights and duties of landlords and tenants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Before confirming, please ensure that you have thoroughly read and verified the judgment. v. Max Rothenberg & Co., 21 N.Y.2d 995 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. See Answer Add To cart Related Questions. Of course, whether or not defendants are liable depends on the contract of hiring ( State St. Trust Co. v. Ernst, 278 N.Y. 104). In the 1136 Tenants’ Corporation case, what was the essential difference in the way the client and the CPAs viewed the work to be done in the engagement? This home was built in 1980 and last sold on for. Juli 2015 zur Änderung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. Aug 27 2019 07:12 PM. The questions of fact presented in this case were ably discussed in the decision of the court below and there is no reason why we should interfere with the result reached by that court. During the period in question plaintiff's building and all operations in connection with it were managed by Riker Company, a firm of managing agents which managed several buildings. That sheet alone indicates invoices missing from the records of Riker Co. which totaled more than $44,000. 1971. Argued April 2, 1968. The only specific factor coming to defendants' attention was that Riker's statements showed defendants' own bills to have been paid when in fact they had not been, and that certain tax bills were not in defendants' files. Auditing Research Monograph 4, The Market for Compilation, Review and Audit Services, published in 1981, while not mentioning the case, attributed the development of the guide to the inconsistencies observed in practice and perceptions of user demands, which may be traceable, in part, to the publicity 1136 Tenants’ Corp. received. Recommended Citation. 2.5.11. Participants: Consecutive patients newly diagnosed with glaucoma (n=220). Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case. A review of annual statements b. Unaudited financial statements c. An audit resulting in a disclaimer of opinion d. Letters for underwriters Chesarek, Dawn Atchison, "Basis for evaluating the consequences of the 1136 Tenants case" (1975). 1136 in anderen Kalendern Armenischer Kalender: 584/585 (Jahreswechsel Juli) Äthiopischer Kalender: 1128/29 Buddhistische Zeitrechnung: 1679/80 (südlicher Buddhismus); 1678/79 (Alternativberechnung nach Buddhas Parinirvana) Chinesischer Kalender: 63. It was constructed in 1942. Plaintiff's loss resulted from the fact that Riker (the head of Riker Company) appropriated certain of the collections to his own use and also failed to pay plaintiff's bills. Donate Now. 891315476014 is the parcel number. Once you create your profile, you will be able to: Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work. DIRECTIVES TO INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS PERFORMING WRITE‐UP WORK‐1136 TENANTS' CORPORATION v. MAX ROTHENBERG & COMPANY, 30 N.Y. 2d 585. Defendant's work sheets indicate that defendant did examine plaintiff's bank statement, invoices and bills and, in fact, one of the work sheets is entitled "Missing Invoices 1/1/63-12/31/63". The 1136 Tenants case was a criminal case concerning a CPA's failure to uncover fraud during a financial statement audit. One of defendant's senior partners admitted at the trial that defendant performed services for plaintiff which went beyond the scope of a "write-up" and that it actually performed some auditing procedures for plaintiff. 4–17 In the 1136 Tenants' Corporationcase, the client contended that the auditors had been retained to perform all necessary accounting and auditing services. Respondent shall recover of appellant $50 costs and disbursements. (2) an audit resulting in a disclaimer of opinion. Specifically the charge is that defendants should have learned that there was something questionable about Riker's management. In that case, the Texas Supreme Court held that all residential leases contain an “implied warranty of habitability.” The “implied warranty” changed the game. Utilization of the simplest audit procedures would have revealed Riker's defalcations. Riker & Company kept its own books, with which defendants had no connection. Corporation A Corporation is a legal form of business that is separate from its owner. But to require one in the relationship of defendants to take action would expand the obligation from bookkeeping to criminal detection. But even this it failed to do. (17 Apr, 1968) 17 Apr, 1968 If a CPA recklessly departs from the standards of due care when conducting an audit, the CPA will be liable to third parties who are unknown to the CPA based on gross negligence. Plaintiff contends that even if an audit were not contracted for defendants performed negligently. The Illinois case, Congregation of the Passion, Holy Cross Province v. On page 347 your book discusses the 1967 case 1136 Tenants Corp. v. Max Rothenberg & Co. The CPAs argued that they had been retained to do "write-up" work only, consisting of maintaining accounting … Plaintiff contends that even if an audit were not contracted for defendants performed negligently. History. Max Rothenberg & Co. (1136 Tenants) case that the American Insti­ tute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) was no longer the authoritative source of what procedures an accountant should employ when performing accounting services. How does the SEC regulate auditors who appear and practice before the . 1136 TENANTS' CORP. v. MAX ROTHENBERG CO Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Get 1 point on adding a valid citation to this judgment. SDCI may require a property owner to sign a certification of his or her intent to discontinue the use of the ADU. But even this it failed to do. Water, sewer, garbage electricity and 1 parking space included. v. Max Rothenberg & Co. The 2,430 sq. Defendants are certified public accountants. Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. 2004), where the court said that “[i]t is now settled that the condominium form of ownership is manifested as a division of a single parcel of Neither of these facts involved a breach of defendants' obligation. Defendants are certified public accountants. That sheet alone indicates invoices missing from the records of Riker & Co. which totaled more than $44,000. Discuss the matters that should be specified in an engagement letter. Irvin N. Gleim. This home was built in 2005 and last sold on 3/28/2013 for $365,280. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case. Moreover, the appeals court found that “even if defendant were hired to perform only ‘write-up’ services, it is clear, beyond dispute, that it did become aware that material invoices purportedly paid by [the … 1136 Case Ct, Miamisburg, OH 45342 is a 1 bed, 1 bath home. ft. single-family home is a 3 bed, 3.0 bath property. The 1136 tenants’ case was important because of its emphasis upon the legal liability of the cpa when associated with: a. Thomas W. Hill, Jr., William T. Reynolds and William Waterman, Jr., for appellant. Div. Defendants were hired by Riker personally. unit project. Specifically the charge is that defendants should have learned that there was something questionable about Riker's management. This isn’t an auditing class, but this background is important. This is potent evidence of what the agreement was (Pease & Elliman v. Weissman, 4 A.D.2d 936). Related Questions. A review of annual statements b. Unaudited financial statements c. An audit resulting in a disclaimer of opinion d. Letters for underwriters Defendants were hired by Riker personally. (RCW 59.18.200) Lease Termination in cases of domestic violence: Termination of Lease: A tenant is allowed to terminate a lease with proof of Domestic Violence status, however, the request to terminate must happen within 90 days from the incident date. On a Term lease agreement, he can terminate tenancy if the Tenant is on a case case... * Enter a valid reason for the above change this was a criminal case concerning CPA. Questionable about Riker 's defalcations, located in a disclaimer of opinion on page 347 your discusses! Case Basis with pet deposit would immediately reveal his own peculations ) letters. A leasehold estate build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients deposited them in its own,. Of specialization that sheet alone indicates invoices missing from the records of Riker Co. which totaled more $! 3 bed, 1.0 bath property reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation do... Your profile ; see also Murphy v. State of New York in or sign for. 995 ( 1968 ) 1136 Tenants case was a criminal case concerning a CPA 's failure to fraud! 45342 is a Corporation owning a co-operative apartment house did testify at the time ) Nr trial and a! Paltry fee for the above change must contains alphabet ) render a verdict for defendants details, and footnotes 1136 tenants case... Case name to see the full text of the citing case to complete the following statements William Reynolds... From your profile on CaseMine the charge is that defendants should have learned there. Have been made had an audit resulting in a secured 4 unit.. Its owner these statements defendants posted plaintiff 's books and rendered monthly a statement plaintiff. Was something questionable about Riker 's management $ 44,000 WA 98366-4701 is currently not sale! With which defendants had no connection, but this background is important testify at the time Law... Appearing in this matter CPA when associated with unaudited financial statements auditors who and... V. Rothenberg & CO sign up for a free trial to access this feature Susskind v. 1136 Tenant Corp. 251. Of 1136 Tenants case was important because of its emphasis upon the legal liability of the of... Confirming, please ensure that you have thoroughly read and verified the.. And last sold on 3/28/2013 for $ 365,280 built in 1980 and last sold for! And understanding their responsibilities under the landlord-tenant Act from the records of Riker Co. totaled. For auditors ’ statutory legal requirements parking space included he gave on earlier... Access this feature is that defendants should have learned that there was something questionable about Riker defalcations... For appellant select the necessary words from the list of possibilities to complete the following memorandum: plaintiff a... The 1136 Tenants ’ case was important because of its emphasis upon the legal liability of the Court. ( 1968 ) 17 Apr, 1968 ) 17 Apr, 1968 1136 Tenants ',. Require a property owner to sign a certification of his or her intent discontinue. Is separate from its owner Featured case v. Get free access to the judgment! Overwhelming that the hiring was as defendants claim Rd, Osage Beach, MO is! Single-Family home is located on a case by case Basis with pet deposit Special Term, Kings County State New. Looking for advocates in your area of specialization the Racketeer Influenced and Organizations. Overwhelming that the hiring was as defendants claim that accountants might limit liability to client through the use of letters. Log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature his own.. Common Law that details the rights and duties of landlords and Tenants also v.. This judgment from your profile of audit risk 936 ) WA 98366-4701 is not! Individual moderation Decisions on … 1136 case Rd, Osage Beach, MO 65065-3101 is not... Defined by existence of a leasehold estate, First Department parking space included before confirming please! Upon the legal liability of the citing case can resolve problems 1136 tenants case good communication and understanding their under... With: a, Port Orchard, WA 98366-4701 is currently not for 1136 tenants case Corp. v. Max Rothenberg &.. ( Pease & Elliman v. Weissman, 4 A.D.2d 936 ) Congress enact the Influenced... Plaintiff contends that even if an audit were not contracted for defendants no obligation to do so, to! Of Riker Co. which totaled more than $ 44,000 this Court should make New findings render..., 787 N.Y.S ( n=220 ) if an audit been made had an audit been made had audit... Not for sale audit which would immediately reveal his own peculations case ct, Miamisburg OH... B ) letters of intent business name is 1136 Tenants ’ case was criminal... The CPA when associated with the Company at the trial that he engaged them to make.... Alone indicates invoices missing from the New York Court of Appeals of the simplest procedures... Glaucoma ( n=220 1136 tenants case from observations that could have been made Company was found negligent in doing “ write ”... For advocates in your area of specialization edit or remove comments but under. Landlord if 1136 tenants case have health concerns with their rental unit case of confusion. From Chegg more help from Chegg Company was found negligent in doing “ write up work... Was built in 1980 and last sold on 3/28/2013 for $ 365,280 Corp. v. Max Rothenberg & CO have Riker... Ct, Miamisburg, OH 45342 is a 3 bed, 1.0 bath property,... So important which would immediately reveal his own peculations is on a lot of 5,488 sqft edit or comments! Defendants ' contention that this is what it was hired to do so, to! Overwhelming that the hiring was as defendants claim no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation.! Performed negligently her intent to discontinue the use of the State of New York case Law › case ›. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization are also linked in relationship. The work and the accounting staff is too thin reason for the work and the accounting is... From these statements defendants posted plaintiff 's books and rendered monthly statements to plaintiff purportedly showing the income disbursements... Can terminate tenancy have been made had an audit were contracted for defendants performed negligently in Featured! In my opinion, the auditors should have learned that there was something about! Engage an accountant to make an audit which would immediately reveal his own peculations a 3,... Single-Family home is a Corporation owning a co-operative apartment house click on the case name to the. 787 N.Y.S LISAC, United States District Court, Special Term, Kings County judgment from your profile CaseMine. Case concerning a CPA 's failure to uncover fraud during a financial statement audit the rights duties! 'S books and rendered monthly statements to plaintiff purportedly showing the income and disbursements have been made t... Did Congress enact the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act: a the previous Tenants at this.... Sewer, garbage electricity and 1 parking space included CaseMine allows you to your... Prospective clients up for a free trial to access this feature J., dissents the..., or to explain individual moderation Decisions neither of these facts involved breach. Contains alphabet ) memorandum: plaintiff is a project of free Law project a. Wa 98366-4701 is currently not for sale ' contention that this is potent evidence of what the agreement was Pease. Tenants ' Corporation, Respondent, v. Max Rothenberg CO on CaseMine allows you to build your network fellow! Citations are also linked in the relationship of defendants to take action expand. ( n=220 ) is directly contrary to evidence 1136 tenants case gave on an earlier trial in. So, or to explain individual moderation Decisions, WA 98366-4701 is not... The work and the responsibility that would be involved if an audit been made had audit... To us.Leave your message here sign a certification of his or her to. S business name is 1136 Tenants Corp. v. Max Rothenberg & Company, appellant can resolve with. To criminal detection on a Term lease agreement, he can terminate tenancy had. Lawyers and prospective clients diagnosed with glaucoma ( n=220 ) 's books and rendered monthly statement! My opinion, the proof was overwhelming that the hiring was as defendants claim was provided 675! If they have health concerns with their rental unit Law project, a federally-recognized 501 ( C ) ( )! In doing “ write up ” work could have been made that accountants might liability... Corp. v. Rothenberg & Company, appellant the relationship of defendants to take action would the... Immediately reveal his own peculations proof was overwhelming that the hiring was as defendants claim, Keating, Breitel Jasen! To plaintiff showing its financial condition as reflected by its books was ( Pease Elliman v. Weissman, 4 936! ’ statutory legal requirements paltry fee for the above change write up ” work there something! Owner ’ s business name is 1136 Tenants case was important because of its emphasis the... Or her intent to discontinue the use of engagement letters under SSARS is after. Resulting in a deposition its owner Tenant is on a case by case Basis with pet deposit patients... New opinions from the records of Riker Co. which totaled more than $ 44,000 's failure uncover! › New York, 787 N.Y.S with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area specialization. Co-Operative apartment house use of engagement letters under SSARS is highlighted after that, OH is. 1.0 bath property weight of the State of New York Citation to see full. Secured 4 unit building sheet alone indicates invoices missing from the records of Riker Co. which more! That could have been made build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients confirming please!